Find this paper

Abstract

Plant DNA metabarcoding enables the identification of plant taxa in mixed samples, with the trnL (UAA) intron and its P6 loop mini-barcode region performing as well as or better than other commonly used markers. Reliable metabarcoding requires high-quality reference databases, yet a regularly maintained trnL resource is currently lacking. Consequently, most studies use uncurated sequences downloaded directly from public repositories without essential validation. We address these gaps by providing guidance through a systematic comparison of three database curation tools - OBITools3/ecoPCR, RESCRIPt, and MetaCurator - to generate three trnL reference sequence databases and evaluate their classification performance across commonly sequenced trnL regions (CD, CH, and GH). Reference trnL sequences and taxonomy files were retrieved from public sequence repositories and curated using standardized filtering steps to reduce taxonomic errors, sequence ambiguity, and redundancy. Four simulated query datasets--two base sets and their mutated counterparts--were constructed to assess classification performance of the databases using the Naive Bayesian Classifier implemented in DADA2.- The evaluation showed that performance differed by trnL region: MetaCurator and RESCRIPt yielded higher and similar metrics for trnL CD; OBITools3/ecoPCR and RESCRIPt were comparable for trnL CH; and MetaCurator attained the highest performance for trnL GH region. All reference databases, taxonomy, and evaluation files are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17969450). The complete computational workflow and scripts are available on GitHub (https://github.com/oskuddar/trnL_DB). Although evaluation was focused on plant taxa in the United States, the resulting databases are suitable for use as global trnL reference databases.

Posts about this paper

No posts about this paper yet. Mention it with @ in a post to start the conversation.